|
|
|
Navigation
Current news for this fund: |
Atticus Funds - Event driven fund2008-09-04 Count of distinct funds: 2
Comment on this article | Subscribe by email! stories: hf-implode.com, bloomberg.com, reuters.com, ft.com Implosion - 2009-08-11This is a confirmation of an implosion that likely happened effective some months ago. Today Barakett has announced that the majority of the outfit will be shut down, and he will be quitting to focus on family and "philanthropic activities" (the usual rigamarole). However, we have the story that Atticus went from ailing to infighting to implosion -- According to two fund-of-funds investors, Barakett and his partner David Slager began fighting over investment strategies last summer. The tussle began when Barakett set up a side-pocket fund for Atticus' investment in Deutsche Boerse, a move investors didn't vote on nor from which did they have the ability to redeem. That caused one fund-of-funds investor to pull his firm's large investment out last fall and warn others he didn't think Barakett could turn his lagging fund around. Atticus was $20B in size at peak (2007) overall. It had atrophied to $14B by July 2008. At the beginning of 2008, Global had about $8.5B of assets; as of closure it was down to $3.5B. The European Fund, managed by Slager, will continue. It has $1.2B of assets remaining. Ailing - 2008-09-04Things could hardly be going well when you're having to deny liquidation rumors, and Atticus Capital, an event driven fund, has been doing just that this past week. According to the Reuters article:
FT Alphaville elaborates on the above percentages using the raw dollars involved noting that, "Atticus had about $14bn under management at the end of July, down from a peak of more than $20bn last year." But as Atticus assures us, they aren't liquidating! At least not intentionally, anyway. We'll be keeping an eye on Atticus Capital. Please let us know if you have any additional information regarding their continued status with regard to investment activities or investor redemptions. permalink to this record | forum thread
Jaxon at 02:45 2011-11-03 said:i hope there is very less people who are aware about atticus funds. But here i am mention some information about it to which they can aware it. Big news out of hedge fund land as manager Timothy Barakett has decided to close his Atticus Capital funds. To be honest, this didn't surprise us too much. After all, we have been covering Atticus' portfolio for some time now and it has been a ridiculous rollercoaster of a ride. We'd been postulating that Atticus' ship was never truly stabilized after they survived a scare in 2008. Barakett says in his farewell letter that he wants to spend more time with family and on philanthropic efforts but it's hard not to wonder if the hellish 2008 for them made his decision that much easier. While redemption issues are not to blame here, it's almost as if they've had trouble recuperating and adjusting to the volatility and wild swings of a bear market. Let's quickly walk through the timeline of Atticus' portfolio we've covered here on Market Folly. Back in September of 2008 we saw that their European fund was -42.5% for the year and their Global fund was -27.2%, thus subjecting them to liquidation rumors. While those rumors proved to be untrue, the poor performance and mass of investors heading for the exits was certainly the first (and largest) warning sign that things were not necessarily well at the firm. As such, Atticus found themselves ranked #2 on a list of the Top 10 Asset Losers in hedge fund land. I feel this will definitely help to them who don't know about it... Permalinkadd a comment | go to forum thread Note: Comments may take a few minutes to show up on this page. If you go to the forum thread, however, you can see them immediately. Important: This fund is on our list of hedge funds that have "imploded" (see also ailing lenders). However, please note that "imploded" is a somewhat subjective. The "imploded" list contains hedge funds (or other unregulated and autonomous speculative investment funds) which have gone through some sort of permanent adverse change. This is a somewhat subjective call, and does not necessarily mean total shutdown or bankruptcy. It can also mean steep and rapid mark-downs in net asset value; or abnormal "bail-out" by corporate parents or peers in order to avoid write-downs and provide liquidity. The funds are of any type and sector. |